🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.